You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In defense of sugar: a critical analysis of rhetorical strategies used in The Sugar Association’s award-winning 1976 public relations campaign
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7401-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristin E. Kearns, Stanton A. Glantz, Dorie E. Apollonio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,063,436
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,344
of 16,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,067
of 347,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#48
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.