You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient and caregiver perspectives on guideline adherence: the case of endocrine and bone health recommendations for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-019-1173-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian Denger, Kathi Kinnett, Ann Martin, Sean Grant, Courtney Armstrong, Dmitry Khodyakov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,595,146
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,118
of 2,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,955
of 342,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#16
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.