↓ Skip to main content

OpenTrials: towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
308 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
OpenTrials: towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials
Published in
Trials, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1290-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Goldacre, Jonathan Gray

Abstract

OpenTrials is a collaborative and open database for all available structured data and documents on all clinical trials, threaded together by individual trial. With a versatile and expandable data schema, it is initially designed to host and match the following documents and data for each trial: registry entries; links, abstracts, or texts of academic journal papers; portions of regulatory documents describing individual trials; structured data on methods and results extracted by systematic reviewers or other researchers; clinical study reports; and additional documents such as blank consent forms, blank case report forms, and protocols. The intention is to create an open, freely re-usable index of all such information and to increase discoverability, facilitate research, identify inconsistent data, enable audits on the availability and completeness of this information, support advocacy for better data and drive up standards around open data in evidence-based medicine. The project has phase I funding. This will allow us to create a practical data schema and populate the database initially through web-scraping, basic record linkage techniques, crowd-sourced curation around selected drug areas, and import of existing sources of structured and documents. It will also allow us to create user-friendly web interfaces onto the data and conduct user engagement workshops to optimise the database and interface designs. Where other projects have set out to manually and perfectly curate a narrow range of information on a smaller number of trials, we aim to use a broader range of techniques and attempt to match a very large quantity of information on all trials. We are currently seeking feedback and additional sources of structured data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 308 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Germany 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 143 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 22%
Other 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 35 23%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 26%
Computer Science 16 11%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 38 25%
Unknown 34 22%