↓ Skip to main content

Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
44 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
Published in
Genome Medicine, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13073-019-0666-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan M. Richters, Huiming Xia, Katie M. Campbell, William E. Gillanders, Obi L. Griffith, Malachi Griffith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 381 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 88 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 18%
Student > Master 39 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Other 20 5%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 100 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 100 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 31 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 8%
Computer Science 19 5%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 110 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#951,724
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#184
of 1,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,005
of 346,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.