You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-9-71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shani Blanga-Kanfi, Hector Miranda, Osnat Penn, Tal Pupko, Ronald W DeBry, Dorothée Huchon |
| Abstract |
Rodentia is the most diverse order of placental mammals, with extant rodent species representing about half of all placental diversity. In spite of many morphological and molecular studies, the family-level relationships among rodents and the location of the rodent root are still debated. Although various datasets have already been analyzed to solve rodent phylogeny at the family level, these are difficult to combine because they involve different taxa and genes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 324 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 22% |
| Researcher | 70 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 47 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 213 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,621,943
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#378
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,545
of 106,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.