You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical significance of urinary L-FABP in the emergency department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12245-019-0244-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ginga Suzuki, Ryo Ichibayashi, Saki Yamamoto, Yoshimi Nakamichi, Masayuki Watanabe, Mitsuru Honda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,987,662
of 25,967,142 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#170
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,196
of 351,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.