↓ Skip to main content

Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-10-150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cédric Baumann, Anne Christine Rat, Georges Osnowycz, Didier Mainard, Christian Cuny, Francis Guillemin

Abstract

Inpatient satisfaction with care is a standard indicator of the quality of care delivered during hospitalization. Total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR) for osteoarthritis (OA) are among the most successful orthopaedic interventions having a positive impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim was to evaluate the effect of satisfaction shortly after hospital discharge on 1-month, 6-month and 1-year Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) scores for OA patients after THR and TKR, controlling for patient characteristics, clinical presentation and preoperative SF-36 scores.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Iceland 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 133 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Psychology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,544,373
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#917
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,060
of 165,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.