You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adolescents’ perceptions of standardised cigarette packaging design and brand variant name post-implementation: a focus group study in Scotland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7552-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle Mitchell, Crawford Moodie, Nathan Critchlow, Linda Bauld |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 47% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Psychology | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,649,970
of 24,870,516 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,115
of 16,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,790
of 346,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#53
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,870,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.