You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of a digital shared decision-making tool in hormonal contraception during clinical assessment: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial in Spain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7572-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Inmaculada de Molina-Férnandez, Laia Raigal-Aran, Miriam de la Flor-Lopez, Paula Prata, Isabel Font-Jimenez, Francesc Valls-Fonayet, Gemma March-Jardi, Ramon Escuriet-Peiro, Lourdes Rubio-Rico |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,349,089
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,639
of 15,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,246
of 340,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#106
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.