↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

The effectiveness of a digital shared decision-making tool in hormonal contraception during clinical assessment: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial in Spain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of a digital shared decision-making tool in hormonal contraception during clinical assessment: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial in Spain
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7572-9
Pubmed ID
31484579
Authors

Maria Inmaculada de Molina-Férnandez, Laia Raigal-Aran, Miriam de la Flor-Lopez, Paula Prata, Isabel Font-Jimenez, Francesc Valls-Fonayet, Gemma March-Jardi, Ramon Escuriet-Peiro, Lourdes Rubio-Rico

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Lecturer 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 41 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 39 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,349,089
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,639
of 15,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,246
of 340,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#106
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.