You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antenatal magnesium individual participant data international collaboration: assessing the benefits for babies using the best level of evidence (AMICABLE)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
The AMICABLE Group |
Abstract |
The primary aim of this study is to assess, using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis, the effects of administration of antenatal magnesium sulphate given to women at risk of preterm birth on important clinical outcomes for their child such as death and neurosensory disability. The secondary aim is to determine whether treatment effects differ depending on important pre-specified participant and treatment characteristics, such as reasons at risk of preterm birth, gestational age, or type, dose and mode of administration of magnesium sulphate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ethiopia | 1 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,767
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,189
of 160,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.