↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the efficacy of once- and twice-daily colchicine dosage in pediatric patients with familial Mediterranean fever – a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the efficacy of once- and twice-daily colchicine dosage in pediatric patients with familial Mediterranean fever – a randomized controlled noninferiority trial
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13075-016-0980-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adem Polat, Cengizhan Acikel, Betul Sozeri, Ismail Dursun, Ozgur Kasapcopur, Nesrin Gulez, Dogan Simsek, Mehmet Saldir, Ipek Dokurel, Hakan Poyrazoglu, Sevcan Bakkaloglu, Ali Delibas, Zelal Ekinci, Nuray A. Ayaz, Yasar Kandur, Harun Peru, Yasemin G. Kurt, Safiye R. Polat, Erbil Unsal, Balahan Makay, Faysal Gok, Seza Ozen, Erkan Demirkaya, for the FMF Arthritis Vasculitis and Orphan Disease Research in Pediatric Rheumatology (FAVOR)

Abstract

In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of a once-daily dosage schema of colchicine compared with a twice-daily dosage schema in pediatric patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). In this 24-week, multicenter, randomized controlled noninferiority trial, pediatric patients newly diagnosed with FMF carrying a homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation and not receiving any treatment were included. Patients were randomly assigned using a block randomization method to receive treatment with a once- or twice-daily dosage. Clinical and laboratory characteristics and medication side effects were recorded and compared between groups. The study was carried out in compliance with Good Clinical Practice and the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement. A total of 92 patients were selected, and 79 patients completed the study. There were 42 patients in the once-daily dosage group and 37 in the twice-daily dosage group. The results indicated that the once-daily dosage was not inferior to the twice-daily dosage regarding decrease in attack frequency and duration as well as improvement in clinical findings and Mor severity scores. Alterations in laboratory findings indicating inflammation, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and serum amyloid A, were similar in both groups. The rates of drug side effects were similar between the once- and twice-daily dosage groups, implying comparable safety of colchicine, with the exception of diarrhea, which was slightly higher in the once-daily dosage group. Using colchicine with either a once- or twice-daily dosage provides similar clinical and laboratory improvements. Considering both efficacy and safety, colchicine can be prescribed with a once-daily dosage. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02602028 . Registered 5 November 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Professor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,203
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,548
of 315,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#24
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.