↓ Skip to main content

Children, parents, and pets exercising together (CPET) randomised controlled trial: study rationale, design, and methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Children, parents, and pets exercising together (CPET) randomised controlled trial: study rationale, design, and methods
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippa S Yam, Ryan Morrison, Viki Penpraze, Carri Westgarth, Dianne S Ward, Nanette Mutrie, Pippa Hutchison, David Young, John J Reilly

Abstract

Objectively measured physical activity is low in British children, and declines as childhood progresses. Observational studies suggest that dog-walking might be a useful approach to physical activity promotion in children and adults, but there are no published public health interventions based on dog-walking with children. The Children, Parents, and Pets Exercising Together Study aims to develop and evaluate a theory driven, generalisable, family-based, dog walking intervention for 9-11 year olds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 245 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 20%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 56 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 14%
Sports and Recreations 33 13%
Psychology 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 66 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,755,290
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,099
of 15,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,277
of 161,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#91
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.