↓ Skip to main content

Opportunities for selective reporting of harms in randomized clinical trials: Selection criteria for non-systematic adverse events

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opportunities for selective reporting of harms in randomized clinical trials: Selection criteria for non-systematic adverse events
Published in
Trials, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3581-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan Mayo-Wilson, Nicole Fusco, Hwanhee Hong, Tianjing Li, Joseph K. Canner, Kay Dickersin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 25%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,560,481
of 15,856,856 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,775
of 4,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,918
of 266,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,856,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.