↓ Skip to main content

End-user experiences with two incident and injury reporting systems designed for led outdoor activities - challenges for implementation of future data systems

Overview of attention for article published in Injury Epidemiology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
End-user experiences with two incident and injury reporting systems designed for led outdoor activities - challenges for implementation of future data systems
Published in
Injury Epidemiology, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40621-019-0214-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline F. Finch, Natassia Goode, Louise Shaw, Paul M. Salmon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Computer Science 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,455,968
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Injury Epidemiology
#241
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,840
of 340,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Injury Epidemiology
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.