You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-0924-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Buels, Eric Yao, Colin M. Diesh, Richard D. Hayes, Monica Munoz-Torres, Gregg Helt, David M. Goodstein, Christine G. Elsik, Suzanna E. Lewis, Lincoln Stein, Ian H. Holmes |
| Abstract |
JBrowse is a fast and full-featured genome browser built with JavaScript and HTML5. It is easily embedded into websites or apps but can also be served as a standalone web page. Overall improvements to speed and scalability are accompanied by specific enhancements that support complex interactive queries on large track sets. Analysis functions can readily be added using the plugin framework; most visual aspects of tracks can also be customized, along with clicks, mouseovers, menus, and popup boxes. JBrowse can also be used to browse local annotation files offline and to generate high-resolution figures for publication. JBrowse is a mature web application suitable for genome visualization and analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 35% |
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Georgia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 22 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 410 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 94 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 15% |
| Unknown | 87 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 104 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Unknown | 109 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,469,119
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,170
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,670
of 316,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#24
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.