You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stem cells in veterinary medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa A Fortier, Alexander J Travis |
| Abstract |
The stem cell field in veterinary medicine continues to evolve rapidly both experimentally and clinically. Stem cells are most commonly used in clinical veterinary medicine in therapeutic applications for the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries in horses and dogs. New technologies of assisted reproduction are being developed to apply the properties of spermatogonial stem cells to preserve endangered animal species. The same methods can be used to generate transgenic animals for production of pharmaceuticals or for use as biomedical models. Small and large animal species serve as valuable models for preclinical evaluation of stem cell applications in human beings and in veterinary patients in areas such as spinal cord injury and myocardial infarction. However, these applications have not been implemented in the clinical treatment of veterinary patients. Reviews on the use of animal models for stem cell research have been published recently. Therefore, in this review, animal model research will be reviewed only in the context of supporting the current clinical application of stem cells in veterinary medicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 216 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 21% |
| Unknown | 51 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 22% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 44 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,795,749
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#104
of 2,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,617
of 106,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them