You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating the burden of dengue and the impact of release of wMel Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes in Indonesia: a modelling study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1396-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen M. O’Reilly, Emilie Hendrickx, Dinar D. Kharisma, Nandyan N. Wilastonegoro, Lauren B. Carrington, Iqbal R. F. Elyazar, Adam J. Kucharski, Rachel Lowe, Stefan Flasche, David M. Pigott, Robert C. Reiner, W. John Edmunds, Simon I. Hay, Laith Yakob, Donald S. Shepard, Oliver J. Brady |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 21% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 55% |
| Scientists | 21 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 21% |
| Unknown | 67 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#469,768
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#356
of 4,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,688
of 352,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.