You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A targeted promotional DVD fails to improve Māori and Pacific participation rates in the New Zealand bowel screening pilot: results from a pseudo-randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7582-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen Bartholomew, Lifeng Zhou, Sue Crengle, Elizabeth Buswell, Anne Buckley, Peter Sandiford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 6 | 86% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,329,123
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,464
of 16,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,664
of 347,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#111
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.