You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-019-0078-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerem Keserlioglu, Halil Kilicoglu, Gerben ter Riet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 49% |
| Scientists | 50 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#514,503
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#19
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,466
of 339,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them