↓ Skip to main content

Methods and feasibility of collecting occupational data for a large population-based cohort study in the United States: the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods and feasibility of collecting occupational data for a large population-based cohort study in the United States: the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie A MacDonald, LeaVonne Pulley, Misty J Hein, Virginia J Howard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,368,065
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,163
of 17,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,820
of 329,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#73
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.