↓ Skip to main content

The Stanford Data Miner: a novel approach for integrating and exploring heterogeneous immunological data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Stanford Data Miner: a novel approach for integrating and exploring heterogeneous immunological data
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-10-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet C Siebert, Wes Munsil, Yael Rosenberg-Hasson, Mark M Davis, Holden T Maecker

Abstract

Systems-level approaches are increasingly common in both murine and human translational studies. These approaches employ multiple high information content assays. As a result, there is a need for tools to integrate heterogeneous types of laboratory and clinical/demographic data, and to allow the exploration of that data by aggregating and/or segregating results based on particular variables (e.g., mean cytokine levels by age and gender). Here we describe the application of standard data warehousing tools to create a novel environment for user-driven upload, integration, and exploration of heterogeneous data. The system presented here currently supports flow cytometry and immunoassays performed in the Stanford Human Immune Monitoring Center, but could be applied more generally. Users upload assay results contained in platform-specific spreadsheets of a defined format, and clinical and demographic data in spreadsheets of flexible format. Users then map sample IDs to connect the assay results with the metadata. An OLAP (on-line analytical processing) data exploration interface allows filtering and display of various dimensions (e.g., Luminex analytes in rows, treatment group in columns, filtered on a particular study). Statistics such as mean, median, and N can be displayed. The views can be expanded or contracted to aggregate or segregate data at various levels. Individual-level data is accessible with a single click. The result is a user-driven system that permits data integration and exploration in a variety of settings. We show how the system can be used to find gender-specific differences in serum cytokine levels, and compare them across experiments and assay types. We have used the tools and techniques of data warehousing, including open-source business intelligence software, to support investigator-driven data integration and mining of diverse immunological data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 11%
Computer Science 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2012.
All research outputs
#13,360,458
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,573
of 3,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,265
of 160,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#24
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.