↓ Skip to main content

Suicidal intention, psychosocial factors and referral to further treatment: A one-year cross-sectional study of self-poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suicidal intention, psychosocial factors and referral to further treatment: A one-year cross-sectional study of self-poisoning
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-10-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mari A Bjornaas, Knut E Hovda, Fridtjof Heyerdahl, Karina Skog, Per Drottning, Anders Opdahl, Dag Jacobsen, Oivind Ekeberg

Abstract

Patients treated for self-poisoning have an increased risk of death, both by natural and unnatural causes. The follow-up of these patients is therefore of great importance. The aim of this study was to explore the differences in psychosocial factors and referrals to follow-up among self-poisoning patients according to their evaluated intention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 37%
Psychology 19 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,707
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,325
of 4,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,722
of 93,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.