↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a programming algorithm for deep brain stimulation in dystonia used in a double-blind, sham-controlled multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of a programming algorithm for deep brain stimulation in dystonia used in a double-blind, sham-controlled multicenter study
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42466-019-0032-2
Authors

Frank Steigerwald, Anna Dalal Kirsch, Andrea A. Kühn, Andreas Kupsch, Joerg Mueller, Wilhelm Eisner, Günther Deuschl, Daniela Falk, Alfons Schnitzler, Inger Marie Skogseid, Juliane Vollmer-Haase, Chi W. Ip, Volker Tronnier, Jan Vesper, Markus Naumann, Jens Volkmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 3 30%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,034,476
of 15,916,110 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#28
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,664
of 271,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,916,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them