↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a programming algorithm for deep brain stimulation in dystonia used in a double-blind, sham-controlled multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of a programming algorithm for deep brain stimulation in dystonia used in a double-blind, sham-controlled multicenter study
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42466-019-0032-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Steigerwald, Anna Dalal Kirsch, Andrea A. Kühn, Andreas Kupsch, Joerg Mueller, Wilhelm Eisner, Günther Deuschl, Daniela Falk, Alfons Schnitzler, Inger Marie Skogseid, Juliane Vollmer-Haase, Chi W. Ip, Volker Tronnier, Jan Vesper, Markus Naumann, Jens Volkmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 25%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,581,703
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#150
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,957
of 345,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.