You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response to ‘The implications of three major new trials for the effect of water, sanitation and hygiene on childhood diarrhea and stunting: a consensus statement’ by Cumming et al.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1414-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan Wilson-Jones, Kyla Smith, Dan Jones, Helen Hamilton, Leah Richardson, Alison Macintyre, Om Prasad Gautam, Erik Harvey, Henry Northover |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 8% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,095,289
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,786
of 3,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,528
of 346,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.