You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The upper midwest health study: a case–control study of pesticide applicators and risk of glioma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-11-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James H Yiin, Avima M Ruder, Patricia A Stewart, Martha A Waters, Tania Carreón, Mary Ann Butler, Geoffrey M Calvert, Karen E Davis-King, Paul A Schulte, Jack S Mandel, Roscoe F Morton, Douglas J Reding, Kenneth D Rosenman, Brain Cancer Collaborative Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,556,186
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#310
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,773
of 167,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.