↓ Skip to main content

Occurrence and characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae in food producing animals, minced meat and raw milk

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occurrence and characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae in food producing animals, minced meat and raw milk
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-8-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Geser, Roger Stephan, Herbert Hächler

Abstract

The impact of food animals as a possible reservoir for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae, and the dissemination of such strains into the food production chain need to be assessed. In this study 334 fecal samples from pigs, cattle, chicken and sheep were investigated at slaughter. Additionally, 100 raw milk samples, representing bulk tank milk of 100 different dairy farms, 104 minced meat (pork and beef) samples and 67 E. coli isolates from cattle E. coli mastitis were analyzed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 310 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 15%
Researcher 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 8%
Other 64 20%
Unknown 59 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 62 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 7%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 74 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,707
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#1,412
of 3,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,975
of 156,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.