You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-12-41 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karin Schneeberger, Melanie Dietz, Michael Taborsky |
Abstract |
Although evolutionary models of cooperation build on the intuition that costs of the donor and benefits to the receiver are the most general fundamental parameters, it is largely unknown how they affect the decision of animals to cooperate with an unrelated social partner. Here we test experimentally whether costs to the donor and need of the receiver decide about the amount of help provided by unrelated rats in an iterated prisoner's dilemma game. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 144 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 21% |
Researcher | 27 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 16% |
Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 40% |
Psychology | 25 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 14 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 12% |
Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,483,169
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#347
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,868
of 172,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.