↓ Skip to main content

Inflammatory responses to induced infectious endometritis in mares resistant or susceptible to persistent endometritis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inflammatory responses to induced infectious endometritis in mares resistant or susceptible to persistent endometritis
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-8-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mette Christoffersen, Elizabeth Woodward, Anders M Bojesen, Stine Jacobsen, Morten R Petersen, Mats HT Troedsson, Henrik Lehn-Jensen

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the gene expression of inflammatory cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, IL-1 receptor antagonist [ra] and serum amyloid A (SAA) in endometrial tissue and circulating leukocytes in response to uterine inoculation of 105 colony forming units (CFU) Escherichia coli in mares. Before inoculation, mares were classified as resistant or susceptible to persistent endometritis based on their uterine inflammatory response to infusion of 109 killed spermatozoa and histological assessment of the endometrial quality. Endometrial biopsies were obtained 3, 12, 24 and 72 hours (h) after bacterial inoculation and blood samples were obtained during the 7 day period post bacterial inoculation. Expression levels of cytokines and SAA were determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 37 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 20 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,537,111
of 12,884,059 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#271
of 1,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,821
of 119,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,884,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.