You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Budgetary impact analysis of buprenorphine-naloxone combination (Suboxone®) in Spain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Economics Review, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2191-1991-2-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jose Martinez-Raga, Francisco Gonzalez-Saiz, Julian Oñate, Itziar Oyagüez, Eliazar Sabater, Miguel A Casado |
Abstract |
Opioid addiction is a worldwide problem. Agonist opioid treatment (AOT) is the most widespread and frequent pharmacotherapeutic approach. Methadone has been the most widely used AOT, but buprenorphine, a partial μ-opiod agonist and a κ-opiod antagonist, is fast gaining acceptance. The objective was to assess the budgetary impact in Spain of the introduction of buprenorphine-naloxone (B/N) combination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 23% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Librarian | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 23% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#331
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,911
of 160,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.