You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bio-efficacy and wash resistance of MAGNet long-lasting insecticidal net against wild populations of Anopheles funestus in experimental huts in Muheza, Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2973-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eliningaya J. Kweka, Patrick K. Tungu, Aneth M. Mahande, Humphrey D. Mazigo, Subira Sayumwe, Shandala Msangi, Lucile Lyaruu, John Waweru, William Kisinza, James Wangai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 22% |
Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,054,117
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,280
of 5,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,816
of 349,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#78
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.