You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genetics and screening of familial hypercholesterolaemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-016-0256-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raymond Henderson, Maurice O’Kane, Victoria McGilligan, Steven Watterson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 9% |
| Norway | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 271 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 16% |
| Researcher | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 80 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,235,088
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#179
of 1,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,519
of 300,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them