↓ Skip to main content

The case of Iranian immigrants in the greater Toronto area: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The case of Iranian immigrants in the greater Toronto area: a qualitative study
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-11-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahdieh Dastjerdi

Abstract

Iranians comprise an immigrant group that has a very different cultural background from that of the mainstream Canadian population and speaks a language other than English or French; in this case mainly Farsi (Persian). Although Iranian immigrants in Toronto receive a high proportion of care from Farsi-speaking family physicians and health care providers than physicians who cannot speak Farsi, they are still not satisfied with the provided services. The purpose of this study was to identify the obstacles and issues Iranian immigrants faced in accessing health care services as seen through the eyes of Iranian health care professionals/providers and social workers working in Greater Toronto Area, Canada.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 185 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 20%
Psychology 34 18%
Social Sciences 30 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,342,903
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#624
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,039
of 168,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.