You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michiel Siebelt, Teun Siebelt, Peter Pilot, Rolf M Bloem, Mohit Bhandari, Rudolf W Poolman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 5% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Librarian | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Other | 16 | 28% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 53% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,257,217
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#842
of 4,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,170
of 165,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.