↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Trauma and Loss Spectrum (SCI-TALS)

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 191)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Trauma and Loss Spectrum (SCI-TALS)
Published in
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1745-0179-4-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liliana Dell'Osso, M Katherine Shear, Claudia Carmassi, Paola Rucci, Jack D Maser, Ellen Frank, Jean Endicott, Liliana Lorettu, Carlo A Altamura, Bernardo Carpiniello, Francesco Perris, Ciro Conversano, Antonio Ciapparelli, Marina Carlini, Nannina Sarno, Giovanni B Cassano

Abstract

DSM-IV identifies three stress response disorders (acute stress (ASD), post-traumatic stress (PTSD) and adjustment disorders (AD)) that derive from specific life events. An additional condition of complicated grief (CG), well described in the literature, is triggered by bereavement.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,631,693
of 17,347,018 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
#28
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,381
of 131,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,347,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them