↓ Skip to main content

Weekend admission to hospital has a higher risk of death in the elective setting than in the emergency setting: a retrospective database study of national health service hospitals in England

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weekend admission to hospital has a higher risk of death in the elective setting than in the emergency setting: a retrospective database study of national health service hospitals in England
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-87
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed A Mohammed, Khesh S Sidhu, Gavin Rudge, Andrew J Stevens

Abstract

Although acute hospitals offer a twenty-four hour seven day a week service levels of staffing are lower over the weekends and some health care processes may be less readily available over the weekend. Whilst it is thought that emergency admission to hospital on the weekend is associated with an increased risk of death, the extent to which this applies to elective admissions is less well known. We investigated the risk of death in elective and elective patients admitted over the weekend versus the weekdays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Other 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,189,682
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,386
of 8,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,416
of 175,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#7
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.