Title |
Effectiveness of the delivery of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in Kenya
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-016-1261-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephanie Dellicour, Jenny Hill, Jane Bruce, Peter Ouma, Doris Marwanga, Peter Otieno, Meghna Desai, Mary J. Hamel, Simon Kariuki, Jayne Webster |
Abstract |
Coverage with malaria in pregnancy interventions remains unacceptably low. Implementation research is needed to identify and quantify the bottlenecks for the delivery and use of these life-saving interventions through antenatal clinics (ANC). A cross-sectional study was carried out in ANC across nine health facilities in western Kenya. Data were collected for an individual ANC visit through structured observations and exit interviews with the same ANC clients. The cumulative and intermediate systems effectiveness for the delivery of intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) to eligible pregnant women on this one specific visit to ANC were estimated. Overall the ANC systems effectiveness for delivering malaria in pregnancy interventions was suboptimal. Only 40 and 53 % of eligible women received IPTp by directly observed therapy as per policy in hospitals and health centres/dispensaries respectively. The overall systems effectiveness for the receipt of IPTp disregarding directly observed therapy was 62 and 72 % for hospitals and lower level health facilities, respectively. The overall systems effectiveness for ITNs for first ANC visit was 63 and 67 % for hospitals and lower level facilities, respectively. This study found that delivery of IPTp and ITNs through ANC was ineffective and more so for higher-level facilities. This illustrates missed opportunities and provider level bottlenecks to the scale up and use of interventions to control malaria in pregnancy delivered through ANC. The high level of clustering within health facilities suggest that future studies should assess the feasibility of implementing interventions to improve systems effectiveness tailored to the health facility level. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
France | 1 | 7% |
Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
Japan | 1 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 121 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
Lecturer | 5 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 41 | 34% |