↓ Skip to main content

Effects of sardine-enriched diet on metabolic control, inflammation and gut microbiota in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids in Health and Disease, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of sardine-enriched diet on metabolic control, inflammation and gut microbiota in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial
Published in
Lipids in Health and Disease, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12944-016-0245-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariona Balfegó, Silvia Canivell, Felicia A. Hanzu, Aleix Sala-Vila, Margarita Martínez-Medina, Serafín Murillo, Teresa Mur, Elena G. Ruano, Francisca Linares, Nuria Porras, Silvia Valladares, Maria Fontalba, Elena Roura, Anna Novials, Cristina Hernández, Gloria Aranda, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Gemma Rojo-Martínez, Rafael Simó, Ramon Gomis

Abstract

Nutrition therapy is the cornerstone of treating diabetes mellitus. The inclusion of fish (particularly oily fish) at least two times per week is recommended by current international dietary guidelines for type 2 diabetes. In contrast to a large number of human studies examining the effects of oily fish on different cardiovascular risk factors, little research on this topic is available in patients with type 2 diabetes. The aims of this pilot study were to investigate the effects of a sardine-enriched diet on metabolic control, adiponectin, inflammatory markers, erythrocyte membrane fatty acid (EMFA) composition, and gut microbiota in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. 35 drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to follow either a type 2 diabetes standard diet (control group: CG), or a standard diet enriched with 100 g of sardines 5 days a week (sardine group: SG) for 6 months. Anthropometric, dietary information, fasting glycated hemoglobin, glucose, insulin, adiponectin, inflammatory markers, EMFA and specific bacterial strains were determined before and after intervention. There were no significant differences in glycemic control between groups at the end of the study. Both groups decreased plasma insulin (SG: -35.3 %, P = 0.01, CG: -22.6 %, P = 0.02) and homeostasis model of assessment - insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SG: -39.2 %, P = 0.007, CG: -21.8 %, P = 0.04) at 6-months from baseline. However only SG increased adiponectin in plasma compared to baseline level (+40.7 %, P = 0.04). The omega-3 index increased 2.6 % in the SG compared to 0.6 % in the CG (P = 0.001). Both dietary interventions decreased phylum Firmicutes (SG and CG: P = 0.04) and increased E. coli concentrations (SG: P = 0.01, CG: P = 0.03) at the end of the study from baseline, whereas SG decreased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio (P = 0.04) and increased Bacteroides-Prevotella (P = 0.004) compared to baseline. Although enriching diet with 100 g of sardines 5 days a week during 6 months to a type 2 diabetes standard diet seems to have neutral effects on glycemic control in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes, this nutritional intervention could have beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, both dietary interventions decreased HOMA-IR and altered gut microbiota composition of drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. Trial number and name of the registry: NCT02294526 , ClinicalTrials.gov.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Unknown 329 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Student > Master 38 11%
Researcher 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 68 21%
Unknown 103 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Unspecified 16 5%
Other 53 16%
Unknown 114 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,596,721
of 25,192,722 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#192
of 1,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,289
of 305,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,192,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.