You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary seaweed intake and depressive symptoms in Japanese adults: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0486-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feng Guo, Cong Huang, Yufei Cui, Haruki Momma, Kaijun Niu, Ryoichi Nagatomi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,909,935
of 24,010,679 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#774
of 1,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,047
of 355,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,010,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.