↓ Skip to main content

A guide to applying the Good Publication Practice 3 guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A guide to applying the Good Publication Practice 3 guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41073-019-0079-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blair R. Hesp, Katsuhisa Arai, Magdalene Y. S. Chu, Stefanie Chuah, Jose Miguel B. Curameng, Sandeep Kamat, Zhigang Ma, Andrew Sakko, Hazel Fernandez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Librarian 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 18%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Unspecified 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,313,839
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#88
of 117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,469
of 351,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.