You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-33 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Atle Fretheim, Jan Odgaard-Jensen, Odd Brørs, Steinar Madsen, Inger Njølstad, Ole F Norheim, Arne Svilaas, Ivar S Kristiansen, Hanne Thürmer, Signe Flottorp |
Abstract |
We conducted a systematic review of evidence from randomized controlled trials to answer the following research question: What are the relative effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease outcomes for healthy people at risk of cardiovascular disease? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
Colombia | 1 | 11% |
Turkey | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
Other | 29 | 21% |
Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 45% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,434,693
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,000
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,901
of 164,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.