↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medicine, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atle Fretheim, Jan Odgaard-Jensen, Odd Brørs, Steinar Madsen, Inger Njølstad, Ole F Norheim, Arne Svilaas, Ivar S Kristiansen, Hanne Thürmer, Signe Flottorp

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of evidence from randomized controlled trials to answer the following research question: What are the relative effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease outcomes for healthy people at risk of cardiovascular disease?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,434,693
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,000
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,901
of 164,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.