↓ Skip to main content

Lifestyle Triple P: a parenting intervention for childhood obesity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lifestyle Triple P: a parenting intervention for childhood obesity
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-267
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanne MPL Gerards, Pieter C Dagnelie, Maria WJ Jansen, Lidy OHM van der Goot, Nanne K de Vries, Matthew R Sanders, Stef PJ Kremers

Abstract

Reversing the obesity epidemic requires the development and evaluation of childhood obesity intervention programs. Lifestyle Triple P is a parent-focused group program that addresses three topics: nutrition, physical activity, and positive parenting. Australian research has established the efficacy of Lifestyle Triple P, which aims to prevent excessive weight gain in overweight and obese children. The aim of the current randomized controlled trial is to assess the effectiveness of the Lifestyle Triple P intervention when applied to Dutch parents of overweight and obese children aged 4-8 years. This effectiveness study is called GO4fit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 342 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 17%
Researcher 52 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 84 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 23%
Psychology 49 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 12%
Social Sciences 33 9%
Sports and Recreations 18 5%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 98 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,629,667
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,103
of 14,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,389
of 161,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#42
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.