You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Malaria diagnosis and treatment practices following introduction of rapid diagnostic tests in Kibaha District, Coast Region, Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-12-293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marycelina Mubi, Deodatus Kakoko, Billy Ngasala, Zul Premji, Stefan Peterson, Anders Björkman, Andreas Mårtensson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,551,568
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#272
of 5,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,515
of 199,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#2
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.