↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study of blood cultures and antibiotic use in patients admitted from the Emergency Department: missed opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional study of blood cultures and antibiotic use in patients admitted from the Emergency Department: missed opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-1515-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura J. Shallcross, Nick Freemantle, Shasta Nisar, Daniel Ray

Abstract

Early review of antimicrobial prescribing decisions within 48 h is recommended to reduce the overall use of unnecessary antibiotics, and in particular the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. When parenteral antibiotics are used, blood culture results provide valuable information to help decide whether to continue, alter or stop antibiotics at 48 h. The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of parenteral antibiotic use, broad spectrum antibiotic use and use of blood cultures when parenteral antibiotics are initiated in patients admitted via the Emergency Department. We used electronic health records from patients admitted from the Emergency Department at University Hospital Birmingham in 2014. Six percent (4562/72939) of patients attending the Emergency department and one-fifth (4357/19034) of those patients admitted to hospital were prescribed a parenteral antimicrobial. More than half of parenteral antibiotics used were either co-amoxiclav or piperacillin-tazobactam. Blood cultures were obtained in less than one-third of patients who were treated with a parenteral antibiotic. Parenteral antibiotics are frequently used in those admitted from the Emergency Department; they are usually broad spectrum and are usually initiated without first obtaining cultures. Blood cultures may have limited value to support prescribing review as part of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Engineering 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,778,976
of 23,993,601 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#463
of 8,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,960
of 302,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#10
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,993,601 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.