You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of age, gender and socio-economic status on multimorbidity patterns in primary care. first results from the multicare cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingmar Schäfer, Heike Hansen, Gerhard Schön, Susanne Höfels, Attila Altiner, Anne Dahlhaus, Jochen Gensichen, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Siegfried Weyerer, Wolfgang A Blank, Hans-Helmut König, Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Karl Wegscheider, Martin Scherer, Hendrik van den Bussche, Birgitt Wiese |
| Abstract |
Multimorbidity is a phenomenon with high burden and high prevalence in the elderly. Our previous research has shown that multimorbidity can be divided into the multimorbidity patterns of 1) anxiety, depression, somatoform disorders (ADS) and pain, and 2) cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. However, it is not yet known, how these patterns are influenced by patient characteristics. The objective of this paper is to analyze the association of socio-demographic variables, and especially socio-economic status with multimorbidity in general and with each multimorbidity pattern. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 356 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 62 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 7% |
| Psychology | 19 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 14% |
| Unknown | 99 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,445
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,426
of 7,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,244
of 161,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#54
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.