↓ Skip to main content

Japanese Resident Physicians' Attitudes, knowledge, and Perceived Barriers on the Practice of Evidence Based Medicine: a Survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Japanese Resident Physicians' Attitudes, knowledge, and Perceived Barriers on the Practice of Evidence Based Medicine: a Survey
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-4-374
Pubmed ID
Authors

Risahmawati RM Risahmawati, Sei SE Emura, Tomoko TN Nishi, Shunzo SK Koizumi

Abstract

Evidence based medicine plays a crucial role as a tool that helps integrate research evidence into clinical practice. However, few reports have yet to examine its application in daily practice among resident physicians in Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the attitudes towards and knowledge of EBM among resident physicians in Japanese and determine perceived barriers to its use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 42%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,528,010
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,011
of 4,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,956
of 132,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#19
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.