You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study of the efficacy and safety of nicotinamide in patients with Friedreich ataxia (NICOFA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurological Research and Practice, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42466-019-0038-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathrin Reetz, Ralf-Dieter Hilgers, Susanne Isfort, Marc Dohmen, Claire Didszun, Kathrin Fedosov, Jennifer Kistermann, Caterina Mariotti, Alexandra Durr, Sylvia Boesch, Thomas Klopstock, Francisco Javier Rodríguez de Rivera Garrido, Ludger Schöls, Thomas Klockgether, Massimo Pandolfo, Rudolf Korinthenberg, Philip Lavin, Geert Molenberghs, Vincenzo Libri, Paola Giunti, Richard Festenstein, Jörg B. Schulz, the EFACTS or NICOFA study group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,583,973
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#150
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,353
of 354,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.