You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neurosurgical applications of MRI guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Imaging, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40644-019-0250-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Usama Salem, Vinodh A. Kumar, John E. Madewell, Donald F. Schomer, Dhiego Chaves de Almeida Bastos, Pascal O. Zinn, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Ganesh Rao, Sujit S. Prabhu, Rivka R. Colen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 22% |
Italy | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 16% |
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 15% |
Unknown | 50 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 22% |
Engineering | 20 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 3% |
Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 54 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,329,687
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
#66
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,528
of 368,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.