↓ Skip to main content

Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous dendritic cell (DC) derived-exosomes: results of thefirst phase I clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
15 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1005 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
628 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous dendritic cell (DC) derived-exosomes: results of thefirst phase I clinical trial
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2005
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-3-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard Escudier, Thierry Dorval, Nathalie Chaput, Fabrice André, Marie-Pierre Caby, Sophie Novault, Caroline Flament, Christophe Leboulaire, Christophe Borg, Sebastian Amigorena, Catherine Boccaccio, Christian Bonnerot, Olivier Dhellin, Mojgan Movassagh, Sophie Piperno, Caroline Robert, Vincent Serra, Nancy Valente, Jean-Bernard Le Pecq, Alain Spatz, Olivier Lantz, Thomas Tursz, Eric Angevin, Laurence Zitvogel

Abstract

BACKGROUND: DC derived-exosomes are nanomeric vesicles harboring functional MHC/peptide complexes capable of promoting T cell immune responses and tumor rejection. Here we report the feasability and safety of the first Phase I clinical trial using autologous exosomes pulsed with MAGE 3 peptides for the immunization of stage III/IV melanoma patients. Secondary endpoints were the monitoring of T cell responses and the clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Exosomes were purified from day 7 autologous monocyte derived-DC cultures. Fifteen patients fullfilling the inclusion criteria (stage IIIB and IV, HLA-A1+, or -B35+ and HLA-DPO4+ leukocyte phenotype, tumor expressing MAGE3 antigen) were enrolled from 2000 to 2002 and received four exosome vaccinations. Two dose levels of either MHC class II molecules (0.13 versus 0.40 x 1014 molecules) or peptides (10 versus 100 mug/ml) were tested. Evaluations were performed before and 2 weeks after immunization. A continuation treatment was performed in 4 cases of non progression. RESULTS: The GMP process allowed to harvest about 5 x 1014 exosomal MHC class II molecules allowing inclusion of all 15 patients. There was no grade II toxicity and the maximal tolerated dose was not achieved. One patient exhibited a partial response according to the RECIST criteria. This HLA-B35+/A2+ patient vaccinated with A1/B35 defined CTL epitopes developed halo of depigmentation around naevi, a MART1-specific HLA-A2 restricted T cell response in the tumor bed associated with progressive loss of HLA-A2 and HLA-BC molecules on tumor cells during therapy with exosomes. In addition, one minor, two stable and one mixed responses were observed in skin and lymph node sites. MAGE3 specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses could not be detected in peripheral blood. CONCLUSION: The first exosome Phase I trial highlighted the feasibility of large scale exosome production and the safety of exosome administration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 618 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 21%
Researcher 95 15%
Student > Master 82 13%
Student > Bachelor 74 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 84 13%
Unknown 131 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 148 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 68 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 5%
Other 72 11%
Unknown 152 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,328,459
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#582
of 4,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,807
of 78,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.