↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: The 2018 UK NHS Digital annual report on the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme: a brief commentary

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: The 2018 UK NHS Digital annual report on the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme: a brief commentary
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2277-2
Authors

Naomi Petra Moller, Gemma Ryan, Jasmine Rollings, Michael Barkham

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Master 4 24%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 53%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,141,167
of 16,033,582 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,149
of 3,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,203
of 330,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#346
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,033,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.