↓ Skip to main content

Endocan is a reliable biomarker during continuous renal replacement therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endocan is a reliable biomarker during continuous renal replacement therapy
Published in
Critical Care, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2585-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxence Hureau, Alexandre Gaudet, Nathalie De Freitas Caires, Erika Parmentier, Julien Poissy, Thibault Duburcq, Philippe Lassalle, Daniel Mathieu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,970
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,457
of 350,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#55
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.